You didnât read the exchange. You didnât understand my post.
I read what you linked from Wal-Mart. Do you not understand what you posted and that Iâm free to respond to what you post?
Youâre putting words into her mouth, which you have a habit of doing, you must have learned that from Crackdawg.
I didnât put ANY words in her mouth. She posted FACTS from Wal-Mart directly.
Walmart made $482B in revenue. Shareholders got $7B through dividends and stock repurchases.
Thatâs about 1.5% of Walmartâs revenue. Meaning 98.5% was spent on the business in wages, facilities, etc.
How little of a percentage do the shareholders deserve?
Oh sorry my bad, I didnât realize you were doing the semantics troll.
I tried that and it seems itâs not fair to respond to that information at ALL.
waah
WHY the fuck did I post those facts? In response to your post questioning my claim that WalMartâs revenues were in the hundreds of billions. What do you not understand about that?
Revenues is only part of the picture, moron.
DUH!!!
Itâs not what is DIVIDED as profit.
MORON
So your argument is that Walmart does NOT generate Billions of dollars?
No fucking shit, Sherlock. I never made an argument about that. You canât fucking read.
I think it must be âselective readingâ or maybe that âCognitive disconnectâ I keep reading about.
YOU canât analyze what you do read, critical âthinkerâ.
What was I supposed to be analyzing, Einstein? You STILL donât understand the meaning of my op on the topic of profits.
Whatâs not to understand about a fast?
Why do you hate low wage workers, Oak?
Link?
It is a well known fact that mathematics is not my friend unless I have a calculator.